Living Literature Review and JCA: An Overview A living systematic literature review (SLR) is a critical asset for health technology developers facing the new operational reality under the European Union Health Technology Assessment Regulation. Joint Clinical Assessments (JCAs) demand comprehensive, transparent, and up-to-date clinical evidence packages that address multiple Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome (PICO)…
Recognition highlights MadeAi’s use of AI to accelerate evidence generation while maintaining the scientific rigor, traceability, and human oversight required in life sciences Cambridge, MA—September 10, 2026—MadeAi, the AI-enabled evidence synthesis provider for life sciences, today announced that it has been named the winner of the 2026 Fierce AI Innovation Award for AI Innovation in…
Medical Information and the Agentic Shift The future of medical information depends on how effectively life sciences organizations can synthesize the rapidly expanding body of scientific evidence. Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) remain the foundation of evidence-based decisions in HEOR, medical affairs, market access, and regulatory submissions. Traditional methods, however, struggle under growing publication volume, tighter…
AI-Powered RoB Assessment: An Overview Risk of bias (RoB) assessment sits at the core of trustworthy systematic reviews. It determines how much confidence decision-makers can place in the studies that inform guidelines, policy, and clinical practice. For years, this work has relied on trained human reviewers applying structured tools such as the Cochrane RoB 2…
Overview A conversational AI literature review changes where the hardest translation in evidence synthesis happens: the move from a clinical question to a database query a reviewer must defend. Evidence teams in life sciences rarely fail for lack of information. They fail because the volume of information has outgrown the methods used to search it.…
Evidence generation increasingly depends on real-world data, but access delays, sparse populations, limited comparators, and privacy constraints can leave critical evidence questions unanswered. Synthetic data offers a way to reduce these barriers by creating statistically representative datasets that support faster analysis, testing, collaboration, and bias assessment. Its value, however, depends on rigorous validation, clear governance,…
