How can pharmaceutical teams scale systematic literature reviews across therapeutic areas while maintaining accuracy and keeping evidence current? MadeAi partnered with a clinical team at a top 15 pharmaceutical manufacturer to deploy MadeAi-LR across ten therapeutic areas, supporting both internal teams and CRO partners. The platform achieved 90% accuracy and 40% time savings, while helping…
What Is Abstract Research with AI? Abstract Research with AI converts a plain-language research question into a summary of published evidence, with each statement linked back to its source record. There is no search string to build and no stack of abstracts to screen by hand. A researcher asks a question and receives an answer…
Read the Unreadable: AI-Native Evidence Synthesis from Forest Plots, Kaplan-Meier Curves, and Beyond
Evidence synthesis often relies on quantitative data embedded in Kaplan-Meier curves, forest plots, and other scientific figures. Extracting this information manually can be time-intensive, inconsistent, and difficult to scale. AI-native approaches combine multimodal AI and computer vision to extract graphical evidence and transform it into structured, analysis-ready data. Their value depends on rigorous validation, governance,…
Living Review: Evidence in Real-Time Living Systematic Reviews exist to solve a timing problem: the evidence base moves while the review is still being written. A review is a photograph. Clinical practice is a film. Between the last search date and the day a decision gets made, new trials report, guidelines shift, and regulators act. …
Missed our live session? Get the recording now! On September 23, 2026, MadeAi hosted a panel discussion bringing together experts across evidence generation, HEOR, market access, and AI to examine how AI should be evaluated in real-world evidence generation workflows. The session explores the growing gap between traditional AI evaluation frameworks and the complex systems…
The Need for AI-Powered Quick Research AI-Powered Quick Research gives life sciences teams a faster way to explore and synthesize evidence while maintaining structure, traceability, and scientific rigor. Traditional systematic literature reviews (SLRs) remain the gold standard for high-stakes evidence in life sciences. However, they often take a long time, consume substantial resources, and struggle…