What is the Evidence Challenge for JCA? The evidence challenge for JCA (Joint Clinical Assessment) is managing multiple population, intervention/exposure, comparator, outcome, and study design (PI(E)COS) requests and indirect comparisons within a strict 100-day submission timeframe. The EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation has applied since 12 January 2025. While most commentary focuses on the formal…

Why AI-Native Tag Insights in SLR Matter AI-Native Tag Insights in SLR transform how systematic literature reviews (SLRs) move from raw study lists to actionable evidence maps. In traditional workflows, reviewers manually code study characteristics, then struggle to spot cross-study patterns or conflicting findings. AI-native tagging applies structured labels at scale and surfaces those patterns…

Evidence Generation for AMCP Dossiers Evidence generation for AMCP (Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy) dossiers sits at the center of successful U.S. market access. Healthcare decision-makers rely on these dossiers to evaluate clinical value, economic impact, and real-world performance before making formulary and coverage decisions. Yet traditional manual processes struggle to keep pace with expanding…

What Is Abstract Research with AI? Abstract Research with AI converts a plain-language research question into a summary of published evidence, with each statement linked back to its source record. There is no search string to build and no stack of abstracts to screen by hand. A researcher asks a question and receives an answer…

Living Review: Evidence in Real-Time Living Systematic Reviews exist to solve a timing problem: the evidence base moves while the review is still being written. A review is a photograph. Clinical practice is a film. Between the last search date and the day a decision gets made, new trials report, guidelines shift, and regulators act. …

The Need for AI-Powered Quick Research  AI-Powered Quick Research gives life sciences teams a faster way to explore and synthesize evidence while maintaining structure, traceability, and scientific rigor. Traditional systematic literature reviews (SLRs) remain the gold standard for high-stakes evidence in life sciences. However, they often take a long time, consume substantial resources, and struggle…